Super Bowl XLI

It's a week to the Super Bowl... and for a change,first, in 1969, not only were they still in Baltimore,
people actually care about the game.they were still in the NFC, too... or rather the NFL,
This Super Bowl promises to be one of the moresince the leagues didn't unite until the following year.
closely contested ones in recent years-as opposed toThe Colts have spent nine hungry years under
the blowouts we've all become accustomed to whenPeyton Manning, repeatedly falling short in the
the New England Patriots aren't involved.playoffs-or not even making them; it's ironic that in
For those not keeping track, there have only beenthe year they finally made it to the big dance, they
five other games since 1980 that were decided by adid it without future Hall-of-Famer Edgerrin James.
touchdown or less: San Francisco's wins in 1982 andThe Bears' presence, on the other hand, came as a
1989, both against Cincinnati; the New York Giants'surprise to almost everybody: nobody was expecting
win when Buffalo made its first of four consecutivethis kind of performance when the season started.
trips in 1991; the Denver Broncos' first win,(Well, I did, having followed their performance closely
overcoming the Green Bay Packers in 1998; and thelast year, especially on defense... but nobody else
St. Louis Rams' last-second stop of the Tennesseewas listening.)
Titans in 2000. All three of the Patriots wins were by"Defense wins championships," we're often told. If
a field goal, as I'm sure we all remember: a total oftrue, this game would have been a no-brainer at the
eight games in 27 years where the winning marginend of the regular season: the Bears had it, the Colts
was less than 10 points. Since five of the past tendid not, especially when it came to the running game.
Super Bowls fall into the single-score category,During the playoffs, though, a miracle occurred: the
younger fans might not remember what a sleeperColts figured out how to stop some of the best RBs
the games were from 1982-1997, where, with thein the league. It's also often overlooked that the
exception of the (then) Los Angeles Raiders' winColts have had one of the best pass defenses all
1984, the championship was decided at the NFCalong-though part of that might have been due to
Conference Championship game: 15 out of 16 winsthe fact that nobody bothered to pass much against
for NFC teams, including 13 in a row. The averagethem anyway. If the Colts can keep up their run
margin of victory during that period was 20.3125stopping, though, there's little question but that they
points... not what most people would describe as acan contain the Bears' questionable offense, led by
"contest."streaky QB Rex Grossman and a pair of
You can imagine how odd it's sounded to my ears tojust-above-average RBs.
hear about "AFC dominance" this year, in light ofWhich means that it will come down to whether or
having lived through that kind of history.not Chicago can do the same to Indianapolis' pair of
However, the AFC has come back, winning sevenjust-above-average RBs and the hottest QB in the
out of the past nine. More importantly, the marginsNFL. The run probably won't cause the Bears any
have narrowed: the average margin of victory inproblems... it's the pass that will beat them, if anything
those games was 11.444 points; take away thecan. Pay special attention to turnovers: both teams
Tampa Bay Buccaneers' 27-point stomping of thewill be trying to force them, and the one that wins
(once again) Oakland Raiders in 2003, and that marginthis battle will probably win the war.
drops to a comfortable 9.5. It appears that "parity" isWho's going to win? I won't predict that just yet:
once again on the radar after all.watch for it later in the week. I can say this much,
This year features what has arguably been the NFL'sthough: watch for Indianapolis to smother Chicago's
best offense over the past several years-theoffense-or at least try to-and the Bears' defense to
Indianapolis Colts-against a defense never to bedo its usual job against the Colts' offense... resulting in
taken lightly-the Chicago Bears. This is only the Bears'a lower-scoring game than most people might have
second appearance, the first coming in 1986; it is theexpected. And a closer one than most people might
Colts' first trip since way back in 1971, when theyhave expected.
were still in Baltimore, and their third overall-for theirIn other words: it should be a good game to watch.